cargojet: (On the phone)
Nathan Petrelli ([personal profile] cargojet) wrote2012-06-01 01:02 am

IC Contact



You've reached Senator Nathan Petrelli. If I'm not answering your call please leave me a message, and I'll get back to you just as soon as I can.
trouvaille: (ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴅ ɢɪʀʟ ɪs ᴀʟʟ ʙᴀᴡᴅʏ.)

[personal profile] trouvaille 2014-06-10 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
( she notes not only that he - in charge of this department, so capably ready to be perceived as a contender to take command of the ship itself - doesn't differentiate his workspace from those around him but also that he tells her so and tells her so as a brief observation, not pointedly. he is very good, she thinks, at the game he tells her not to worry about playing; the observation isn't a critical one. somebody has to be, and somebody might need to be, sooner or later. if he's quietly campaigning through the backdoor, then at least he's building it on genuine, demonstrable competence. she can respect that.

however. )


Erased the old crew...?
trouvaille: (ᴀɴᴅ ᴅᴏ ᴀʟʟ sᴏʀᴛs ᴏғ ᴛʜɪɴɢs)

[personal profile] trouvaille 2014-06-10 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Everyone's always so, oh, we don't know anything so don't even ask.

( it's an observation that she doesn't press any further - she's not going to complain about it, or go rattling cages, but her restlessness with that is hard to miss even from the fact that she's here asking these questions or that she does feel the need to comment on it at all. being told to accept ignorance is something that she can't help but resent; information is control, and ilde has always both wanted it and been clever enough to know where to find it.

she's already made her mind up that this is an acquaintance she's going to maintain. even if none of it is information she can do anything with, even if all she can do is hoard it like a shield against complacency, that'll do. )
trouvaille: (ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴅ ɢɪʀʟ ɪs ᴀʟʟ ʙᴀᴡᴅʏ.)

[personal profile] trouvaille 2014-06-10 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I get it, I do.

( inasmuch as she can - she grasps it intellectually, but she hasn't been here for as long as they have, doesn't feel the weight of so much time, so much loss and confusion and so much silence, drawing conclusions in the dark. she hasn't lived it, yet, and even if she knows coping strategies for what they are, she can't help but resent the consequences.

but in two, five, ten years from now it's unlikely that that will change so much - she'll still understand it only from a logical standpoint, still resent it from an emotional one. it isn't how she copes, and it inconveniences her, so it's annoying and stupid. the only difference is that given time and confidence, she might be louder about how much it irritates her. )


Just-- well, you get it, too. ( a shrug, loose-limbed. )

If I think of more questions, I'll know where to find you. I'm always curious about something.